Webinar
Stop Guessing, Start Enrolling
A data-driven approach to trial forecasting — and to fixing enrollment before the timeline does it for you.
Most enrollment forecasts are one line on one slide: a target, a curve, and a hope. When sites underperform, that model can't tell you why — or what to do next. In conversation with leaders from CSL Behring and Merck, we'll walk through what a defensible forecast looks like in practice.
Save your seat
Free to attend. Registration closes when the room fills.
- Date
- Tuesday, August 25
- Time
- 11:00 AM ET / 8:00 AM PT
- Length
- 60 minutes
- Format
- Online panel + Q&A
Practitioners who defend these forecasts internally
Chris Conklin
Triathlete. Treats enrollment timelines the same way — pace it wrong early and the back half hurts.
Ed White
Loves dogs, trains, planes, and free boats. Ask him about the boats — there is an explanation.
Joseph Kim
Asks the question everyone in the room is already thinking. Collects enrollment horror stories.
Four things a real forecast does that a single curve can't
Use benchmarks that actually apply
How to select comparator studies with predictive value — and how to recognise when a benchmark is quietly setting you up to miss.
Model inputs, not outcomes
Build scenarios from site activation, referral volume, and screen-fail rates instead of back-solving a curve from the date you promised.
Diagnose the delay before you spend
Tell a site problem from a protocol problem from a funnel problem — the three look identical on an enrollment chart and need opposite responses.
Choose interventions in combination
What adding sites, expanding geography, amending criteria, and funding outreach each realistically buy you — and how they interact.
Bring the study that's behind
Tuesday, August 25, 2026 · 11:00 AM ET / 8:00 AM PT · 60 minutes, online. Free to attend.
Reserve my seatCan't make it live? Register anyway and we'll send the recording.